As Grogan and Jenny move through life’s challenges (changing jobs, relocating, conceiving a child, miscarriage, post partum depression and illness), Marley faithfully moves with them. When their hearts break after a miscarriage, Marley’s head hangs in sympathy. And when they discover they’ve conceived again, it is Marley who steals the pregnancy test results then gives himself away by dancing his signature “Marley Mambo”— tail-wagging so vigorously it shakes his entire back half!

“I have this theory…that people can learn a lot from their dogs. Lessons on how to lead happier, more fulfilling lives. Lessons for successful relationships. Think about it. Many of the qualities that come so effortlessly to dogs—loyalty, devotion, selflessness, unflagging optimism, unqualified love—can be elusive to humans.” -John Grogan, Author of Marley & Me

In no way, however, is Marley the perfect dog. An obedience school reject, his dirty deeds test the couple’s patience and good will as much as his unconditional love teaches them! Although totally without malice, Marley is, as Grogan describes him, “the world’s worst dog”! So bad, that the obedience class instructor, whom Grogan refers to as Miss Dominatrix, uses Marley as an example of “what not to do” before expelling him. He is neurotic, with a fear of thunder so intense that the vet describes him as mentally ill and prescribes doggie Xanax to keep him from hurting himself during storms when he plows through drywall and chews off doorknobs in the Grogan household. He shreds screen doors, gouges couches, and ingests fine jewelry.

And Marley is social, if not socially skilled, as the Grogan’s horrified neighbors witness one sunny afternoon as the 97-pound wrecking ball drags a food-laden restaurant table half a mile down a crowded Florida beach to his canine friends.

The dog brazenly goes after what he wants in the name of fun, (nearly ousting himself from the Grogan family in the process), forcing the couple to redefine their idea of a “loveable” dog. This redefined idea of what it means to love and be loveable is the messageMarley & Medrives home. Marley is easy to love, not because he’s cute and entertains, but because his misdeeds and weaknesses make the end result of loving him so sweet—because they become better people.

Marley & Me is now a major motion picture, scheduled to be in theaters on December 23, 2008.

Possibly Related Posts:

• Book Review: Redemption

Redemption, The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America

The book begins with a comprehensive review of the history of the humane movement in the United States, starting with the founding of the first Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA), the American SPCA, or ASPCA, in New York City in 1866 by Henry Bergh.

The mission of the ASPCA and the other SPCA’s which sprouted up around the country, was to prevent cruelty to animals; to protect animals from people. This was fundamentally at odds with that of the taxpayer funded city shelters (the “pounds”). Their primary mission was to protect people from animals.

Henry Bergh felt very strongly that the two were separate and distinct movements. When asked if the ASPCA would take over the function of rounding up strays and then disposing of them, Bergh refused. He believed that the ASPCA was a tool to champion and protect life, not to end it.

But that changed when Bergh died in 1888. Under new leadership, the ASPCA accepted a contract to run the city pound, and by 1910, the ASPCA was impounding dogs and cats on behalf of the city, with most of them unfortunately being put to death. Most other SPCA’s across the country followed suit.

It is important to note that at this point in our history, stray animals were being killed in terribly inhumane ways by city shelters, including drowning (in public!), beating and shooting. One of the reasons that private SPCA’s got involved with these animal control contracts, and therefore the killing of homeless pets, was so that the animals would not suffer such a painful death, that they would be killed in more humane ways.

It is also important to note that the ASPCA no longer holds the animal control contract in New York City. Although the intention may have been honorable, the impact, Winograd argues, was to dilute and distract from the primary mission of these SPCA’s, which was to protect the lives of animals.

Instead, the business of rounding up and ultimately killing the majority of these homeless animals became the centerpiece of most of the SPCA’s across the country—adopting a few and killing the rest. This, according to Winograd, is when the humane movement started to lose its way.

Fast forward to 1976 when a newcomer to animal welfare, Richard Avanzino, a successful businessman and politician, was hired as the Executive Director of The San Francisco SPCA. In 1989, he gave up the animal control contract with the city of San Francisco.

In 1994, he spearheaded the Adoption Pact, which guaranteed a home to all healthy dogs and cats in San Francisco. By implementing a series of life saving programs and services, one year after the Adoption Pact, San Francisco became the first city in the country to save all healthy animals, and the deaths of sick and injured (treatable) animals dropped by nearly 50 percent. In the first five years of the Adoption Pact, cat deaths declined by over 70 percent and dog deaths by 75 percent. When Avanzino left the SF SPCA in

1998, San Francisco’s shelter killing was a fraction of the national average. The success of San Francisco was unparalleled anywhere else in the country.

But rather than celebrate, applaud and emulate their results, many in the humane community instead tried to undermine the success in San Francisco. It was called “more hoax than fact.” It was argued that the success was largely due to the city’s homosexual population, claiming that “the gay community is traditionally the most animal friendly.” Some said it could only happen in a wealthy urban community. Nathan Winograd, a former prosecuting attorney and lifelong animal advocate, was the Director of Operations at the San Francisco SPCA, under Richard Avanzino.

Nathan Winograd, Author of Redemption

In 2000, Winograd left the San Francisco SPCA and became the Executive Director of the Thompkins County SPCA in Ithaca, New York. Thompkins County SPCA is an open admission animal control agency.

By implementing critical life saving programs and services, in two years, the death rate declined by 75 percent. Within three years, Thompkins County became the safest community for homeless animals in the United States, saving 93 percent of all dogs and cats who entered the shelter. Thompkins county became the first No Kill community, saving all healthy and treatable dogs and cats, and all feral cats through the use of Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR).

The crux of the No Kill model is a set of programs and services that Winograd refers to as the No Kill Equation. These mandatory programs and services are:

1. Feral cat TNR program
2. High volume, low cost spay/neuter services
3. Working with rescue groups
4. Foster care program
5. Comprehensive adoption program
6. Pet retention programs
7. Medical and behavioral rehabilitation programs
8. Public relations, community involvement
9. Working with volunteers
10. Compassionate director

 
After leaving the Thompkins County SPCA in 2005, Winograd founded the No Kill Advocacy Center, a nonprofit dedicated to the creation of a No Kill nation.

Winograd has helped numerous facilities implement the No Kill model with dramatic life saving results. Some notable examples include Atlanta, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Philadelphia.

Prior to implementing the No Kill Equation, Fulton County Animal Control had about a 90 percent kill rate. Within a year of implementing the life saving programs and services of the No Kill Equation, their kill rate was cut in half.

The Charlottesville Albermarle SPCA is an agency which contracts for animal control sheltering in Charlottesville, Virginia. In a little over a year after implementing the No Kill Equation, the Charlottesville SPCA saved over 90 percent of all dogs and cats.

The Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association had a kill rate near 80 percent . Within 7 months of implementing the No Kill Equation, they saved more than 50 percent of the animals entering their facility, a milestone that had never been achieved before. Winograd argues, any shelter that truly wants to save lives must fully embrace and implement all elements of the No Kill Equation. This book is informative, insightful and rational. It is important to anyone who has an interest in companion animals. It is a critical read for anyone truly interested in building a No Kill community.

The time has come to stop arguing with results. The animals are counting on us.

This book will no doubt be controversial in some quarters of the humane movement, as Winograd does not mince words, nor pull any punches when it comesto criticizing organizations that he feels have failed to do all they can to build a No Kill nation, to save even more animal’s lives.

Hopefully counterproductive reactions, like defending positions and other related activities are a thing of the past because this does not result in any more lives being saved. And in fact, expending energy on these types of activities actually has the opposite effect because precious resources get diverted from the most important task at hand, that of saving animals lives. Hopefully every shelter management team and Board of Directors take a long hard look at the No Kill Equation, and vigorously implements all of these programs and services.

An especially refreshing aspect of this book is the inspirational tone and message of hope. Winograd argues, not only is saving all healthy and treatable animals possible, as has already been demonstrated, it’s inevitable. But the longer it takes, the larger the toll in body count of our innocent, amazing four-legged friends.

Possibly Related Posts:

• Marley & Me